Oncology Insights: December 2024 - Prime Therapeutics
Decoding Cancer: How Genetic and Genomic Testing Advance Treatment
Scientists have made remarkable progress in understanding the thousands of genes inside our cells and the link they may have to cancer. Researchers continue to discover patient-specific characteristics that allow for customized care and personalized treatments.¹ These advances in cancer care include genetic and genomic testing. Routinely, the terms genetic and genomic testing are interchanged, but they have distinct yet complementary roles.¹˒²
Genetics focuses on the study of genes inherited from family members across generations. Every cell in the human body contains deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), which houses thousands of genes. Genetic testing examines the genes in a patient’s DNA for mutations, or genetic changes, which can be used to assess an individual’s lifetime risk for cancer or other illnesses.² Typically, providers collect blood or saliva samples for genetic testing because these samples are easy to obtain and contain the DNA needed for testing. In addition to determining cancer risk, genetic tests can guide preventative care.¹ For example, individuals with a family history of breast cancer might undergo genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2, the most common mutations associated with the disease. If the patient has either one of these inherited mutations, they can initiate a combination of early monitoring, lifestyle changes, or surgery to reduce the chance of developing cancer.²⁻⁴ To put this into perspective, studies have shown that more than 60% of women who inherit a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation may develop breast cancer at some point in their lives, while only 13% of women without the mutation may develop breast cancer.⁵ Although the presence of the genetic mutation significantly increases the risk, it does not guarantee that an individual will develop cancer.
Genomic testing, also referred to as molecular or biomarker testing, focuses on genetic changes specifically within the cancer cell DNA. This approach is central to precision medicine, which tailors treatments to the individual characteristics of each patient’s disease.¹˒⁶ To obtain the cancerous cells, a tissue biopsy or bodily fluid (e.g., blood, fluid buildup in the abdomen) may be collected.⁷ Sophisticated laboratory techniques, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), identify mutations inside the cancer cell. Drugs that target the specific mutation found, are often used to treat the cancer. For example, when a provider orders an NGS test for a lung cancer patient they may discover an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. For non-small cell lung cancers that test positive for the EGFR biomarker, studies have shown that using a drug that targets the EGFR mutation upfront significantly improves progression- and disease-free survival compared to standard chemotherapy.⁸⁻¹⁰
By selecting drugs customized to the patient’s cancer, providers deliver highly personalized care that may improve outcomes and reduce costs associated with suboptimal treatment. This approach minimizes expenses associated with trial-and-error treatment and frequent therapy adjustments.¹¹ A recent study highlights the financial impact of selecting non-targeted therapies due to undetected mutations. Investigators found that the per patient costs associated with inadequate therapies were $6,455, $6,566, and $6,569 over the first one, two, and three years of treatment, respectively.¹²
Genetic and genomic testing each play a crucial role in matching patients with treatments most likely to yield the best clinical outcomes. As precision medicine continues to evolve and more targeted therapies enter the market, cancer care is transforming. By embracing these advancements, payers, providers, and health care teams are better equipped to provide valuable and effective care for patients.
All brand names are property of their respective owners.
References:
Cancer-related genomic testing and genetic testing. (2023, November 2). American Cancer Society. Retrieved November 26, 2024, from https://www.cancer.org/cancer/understanding-cancer/genes-and-cancer/genomic-genetic-testing.html
Genomic vs. genetic testing for cancer. (2022, May 2). City of Hope. Retrieved November 21, 2024, from https://www.cancercenter.com/diagnosing-cancer/genetic-and-genomic-testing
Petrucelli N, Daly MB, Pal T. BRCA1- and BRCA2-Associated Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. 1998 Sep 4 [Updated 2023 Sep 21]. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2024. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1247/
Daniele A, Divella R, Pilato B, Tommasi S, et al. Can harmful lifestyle, obesity and weight changes increase the risk of breast cancer in BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation carriers? A Mini review. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2021 Oct 27;19(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13053-021-00199-6.
BRCA gene changes: cancer risk and genetic testing fact sheet. (2024, July 19). National Cancer Institute. Retrieved November 26, 2024, from https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/genetics/brca-fact-sheet#:~:text=Female%20breast%20cancer%3A%20More%20than,breast%20cancer%20during%20their%20lifetime
Precision or personalized medicine | Precision medicine for cancer. (2023, June 15). American Cancer Society. Retrieved November 26, 2024, from https://www.cancer.org/cancer/managing-cancer/treatment-types/precision-medicine.html
NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms. (n.d.-a). National Cancer Institute. Retrieved November 21, 2024, from https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/molecular-testing
American Lung Association. (2024, September 26). EGFR and lung cancer. Retrieved November 26, 2024, from https://www.lung.org/lung-health-diseases/lung-disease-lookup/lung-cancer/symptoms-diagnosis/biomarker-testing/egfr
Shah, R., & Lester, J. F. (2020). Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Clash of the Generations. Clinical lung cancer, 21(3), e216–e228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2019.12.003
Zhao, P., Zhen, H., Zhao, H., Zhao, L., & Cao, B. (2022). Efficacy and safety of adjuvant EGFR-TKIs for resected non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized control trials. BMC cancer, 22(1), 328. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09444-0
Sadik, H., Pritchard, D., Keeling, D. M., Policht, F., Riccelli, P., Stone, G., Finkel, K., Schreier, J., & Munksted, S. (2022). Impact of Clinical Practice Gaps on the Implementation of Personalized Medicine in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. JCO precision oncology, 6, e2200246. https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.22.00246
Bestvina, C. M., Waters, D., Morrison, L., Emond, B., Lafeuille, M. H., Hilts, A., Mujwara, D., Lefebvre, P., He, A., & Vanderpoel, J. (2024). Impact of next-generation sequencing vs polymerase chain reaction testing on payer costs and clinical outcomes throughout the treatment journeys of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 30(12), 1467–1478. https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2024.24137